Pakistan’s Federal Law Minister, Azam Nazir Tarar, has strongly criticized the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) for its call for civil disobedience. In a pointed statement, Tarar also reaffirmed the government’s stance against offering any NRO-style deal to PTI Chairman Imran Khan, reiterating that accountability will take its due course.

PTI’s Civil Disobedience Call

The PTI’s recent call for civil disobedience has sparked heated political debate. The party has urged citizens to resist government policies, a move seen as an escalation in its opposition to the ruling coalition. PTI leaders have framed this as a protest against alleged injustices and the government’s handling of the country’s economic and political challenges.

Tarar’s Response

Law Minister Tarar condemned the civil disobedience call, labeling it as “irresponsible” and counterproductive to the nation’s stability. He argued that such actions undermine democratic processes and harm Pakistan’s international reputation.

“Calling for civil disobedience during a time of economic recovery is not just unpatriotic but also a deliberate attempt to destabilize the nation,” Tarar stated during a press briefing.

No NRO for Imran Khan

Addressing speculation about a possible deal for Imran Khan, Tarar categorically ruled out any leniency or NRO-style arrangement. He emphasized that the law applies equally to everyone and that no individual, regardless of their position, is above accountability.

“Imran Khan must face the legal process without expecting preferential treatment. The government remains committed to upholding the rule of law,” he added.

Political Implications

The civil disobedience call and the government’s firm stance against an NRO highlight the deepening polarization in Pakistan’s political landscape. Analysts suggest that these developments could further escalate tensions between the government and PTI, potentially impacting public sentiment and governance.

Azam Nazir Tarar’s remarks reflect the government’s unwavering stance on accountability and its opposition to actions perceived as threats to national stability. With both sides holding firm positions, the coming weeks are likely to witness intensified political activity, shaping the trajectory of Pakistan’s future governance and public discourse.