The government has made a formal appeal to opposition parties, urging them to take part in dialogue and deliberations surrounding the proposed 26th Constitutional Amendment, which is expected to bring changes to the provincial devolved governance structure. In its outreach, the administration emphasized that meaningful constitutional reform can only proceed if it is informed by bipartisan input and consensus, highlighting that marginalizing the opposition may hinder long-term legitimacy and effectiveness of the amendment.

Officials pointed out that the proposed amendment entails significant shifts in the governance architecture, devolution of powers to the provinces, and adjustments in resource distribution rules. Given the sensitivity of constitutional structure, the government underscored the importance of building trust through inclusive debate and transparent legal drafting. The Prime Minister’s office reaffirmed that the constitutional process should remain consultative rather than centralized, invoking past precedents where cross-party consensus helped cement reforms with broader societal acceptance.

In a message to political stakeholders, the government clarified that all key provisions ranging from fiscal decentralization to legislative adjustment and local governance empowerment were open to discussion. It invited representatives from opposition benches to join working groups, parliamentary committees, and legal review sessions. By participating, opposition parties could raise concerns, propose amendments, and contribute to refining clauses, thereby strengthening the amendment’s legitimacy.

The government also reassured the public that the goal is not partisan victory but durable constitutional clarity. A spokesperson stated that evolving governance demands especially amid economic, demographic, and administrative pressures necessitate updated constitutional provisions. In that context, broad-based political agreement is crucial for long-term stability and avoiding future legal or institutional disputes.

Analysts noted that this invitation reflects a strategic shift toward collaborative lawmaking, especially at a time when public skepticism over one-party reform efforts is rising. Observers argued that the creation of special bipartisan committees, open hearings, and participatory sessions could promote transparency, allow civil society engagement, and ensure that the revised constitutional framework reflects diverse stakeholders: provinces, local governments, and impacted communities.

The government concluded by proposing a timeline for engagement: opposition parties are encouraged to nominate delegates within a short window so working groups can convene ahead of the amendment’s final legislative debate. With parliamentary business scheduled to resume later in the month, the government emphasized urgency while reiterating that the amendment’s success hinges on genuine cross-party negotiation.

By extending this invitation, the administration is signaling its willingness to bind the constitutional process to inclusive values of democratic input and institutional cooperation. The government argued that if opposition voices remain sidelined, the amendment may lack the broad support needed to stand the test of time. The gesture sets a tone for the upcoming legislative session and prompts reflection on how constitutional change can become a platform for shared vision rather than unilateral reform.