An associate professor from Tehran University claims that over 2,000 people, including 165 young girls, have died due to joint attacks by the United States and Israel. Fouad Izadi stated these assaults were unlawful, asserting that Iran posed no threat to the US. He suggested Israel pressured the US into these actions, using American soldiers to further its regional dominance. This conflict, according to Izadi, has created significant problems not only for Iran but also for other nations like India.

Izadi further alleged that Israel’s primary objective is to gain control over Iran’s oil resources, drawing a parallel to a coup in 1953. He explained that Iran initially targeted only American military bases, which he considered legitimate military objectives. Iran only began striking Iranian oil facilities after its own oil infrastructure was attacked from the other side.

The professor clarified that while oil refineries are typically not considered legal military targets, Iran felt compelled to retaliate when its own facilities were hit. He emphasized that Iran had no other recourse but to respond to the attacks on its oil infrastructure. This act of response, he implied, was a direct consequence of the initial aggression against Iranian assets.

According to Izadi, the repercussions of this conflict extend beyond regional instability, impacting global energy supplies and political equilibrium. The ongoing tensions highlight the seriousness of the dispute between Iran and Western nations. These broader implications suggest that the conflict could have far-reaching consequences for international relations and economic stability.

The escalation of hostilities and the resulting casualties underscore the volatile nature of the current geopolitical climate. Izadi’s statements point to a deepening rift and potentially increased friction between Iran and the US-led coalition. The situation remains tense, with ongoing concerns about further escalation and its global ramifications.